Labor Force Gender Index

The Labor Force Gender Index (LFGI) is a 4-item measure that uses data from the Canadian Labour Force survey to create a gender index based on gender roles and institutionalized gender. The four main measurement components to the LFGI include responsibility for caring for children, occupational segregation, hours of work relative to partner/spouse, and education relative to partner or spouse.

Short Measure Multi-Country

ITEMS:

Responsibility for Caring for Children

If you were away from work (either completely or partially) in the last week, what was the reason?

Response Options:
Personal or family responsibility
Other response options not specified

For respondents working less than 30 hours per week: What is the main reason you are not working more hours per week?

Response Options:
Caring for children
Other personal or family responsibilities
Other response options not specified

Occupational Segregation

What is your current occupation?

Response Options:
Self-reported occupation is coded into 47 major groups based on the National Occupational Classification system.

Hours of Work Relative to Partner or Spouse

How many hours do you usually work each week?
For respondents currently living with a spouse: How many hours does your spouse usually work each week?

Response Options:
[Enter number of hours]

Education Relative to Partner or Spouse

What is the highest level of education you have achieved?
For respondents currently living with a spouse: What is the highest level of education your spouse has achieved?

Response Options:
0-8 years of education
Some secondary education
Graduated from high school
Some post-secondary education
Post-secondary certificate or diploma
University degree

CATEGORIES:


GEOGRAPHIES TESTED:
India
United States

POPULATIONS INCLUDED:
Female
Male

AGE RANGE:
Adults
Children

SAMPLE SIZE:
Sample size info

Scoring Procedures:

Responsibility for Caring for Children: Response options are recoded as follows:

0=no reduction in labor market participation due to personal or family responsibilities;
1=part or full week absence due to personal or family responsibilities; and
2= working part-time due to personal or family responsibilities.

Occupational Segregation: The 47 occupations are reclassified into 4 groups using occupational data from the 1997 Labor Force Survey:

0=occupations where less than 26% of workers were women;
1=occupations where 26 to 50% of workers were women;
2=occupations where 51 to 74% of workers were women;
3=occupations where 75% or more of workers were women.

Hours of Work Relative to Partner of Spouse: Open-ended numerical responses are grouped into the following 4 categories:

0= respondent working, but spouse not in the labor force;
1=respondent working more hours than their spouse;
2=respondent working the same number of hours as their spouse; and
3=respondent working less hours than their spouse.
Respondents not currently living with a spouse are grouped with respondents working more hours than their spouse.

Education Relative to Partner or Spouse: Responses are coded into the following 3 categories:

0=respondents with a higher level of education than their spouse;
1=respondents with the same level of education as their spouse; and
2=respondents with a lower level of education than their spouse.
Respondents without a spouse are grouped with respondents with a higher level of education than their spouse.

LFGI Score: To calculate the final LFGI score, the values from each of the 4 categories are summed, resulting in a score ranging between 0 and 10 for each respondent. Higher scores indicate more traditionally feminine gender labor market roles and lower scores indicate more traditionally masculine gender labor market roles.

Primary Citation: Smith, P. M. & Koehoorn, M. (2016). Measuring gender when you don’t have a gender measure: Constructing a gender index using survey data. International Journal for Equity in Health, 15 (82), 1-9. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0370-4.

Pyschometric Score:

FORMATIVE RESEARCH

 Qualitative Research

 Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

 Field Expert Input

 Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

RELIABILITY

 Internal

 Test-retest

 Interrater

VALIDITY

 Content (Face)

 Criterion

 Construct


Total Score: 2.5/7 Points (MEDIUM) 

For more details, see Scoring Methodology

KEY

 FULL POINTS
 PARTIAL POINTS
 NOT ASSESSED
 NOT APPLICABLE
 

Citation Frequency

You have successfully registered

There was an error while trying to send your request. Please try again.

EMERGE will use the information you provide on this form to be in touch with you and to provide updates and marketing.