Decisional Balance Scale

The decisional-balance scale is a 14-item measure of decision making regarding general contraception and condom use. It includes 4 domains: cons for IUD, pros for contraception, pros for IUD, and cons for contraception. Items for pros included benefits of using contraception or IUD such as prevention of unwanted pregnancy, and cons included disadvantages such as ‘hassles’ associated with contraceptive methods, personal beliefs, costs, etc.

High Psychometric Score

ITEMS:

Cons for IUD

1. IUD may cause abdominal pain
2. IUD may cause bleeding
3. IUD may cause problems like dizziness and headache
4. IUD may cause PID (pelvic inflammatory disease)

Pros for contraception

5. Contraception helps you not to deal with results of unwanted pregnancy
6. Your wife would not have to worry about becoming pregnant if using contraception
7. Contraception helps to limit size of the family
8. Contraception helps you to become more responsible for decisions of having children

Pros for IUD

9.   IUD may effective in prevention of pregnancy
10. IUD may work for long time
11. IUD use does not require the advanced preparation before having sexual intercourse

Cons for contraception

12. Contraception makes sexual intercourse difficult to do in a family setting
13. Some contraceptive methods are costly
14. Contraception is again your beliefs

Response Options:
Respondents were asked to rate each item on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from ‘not important’ to ‘very important’.

CATEGORIES:


GEOGRAPHIES TESTED:

Vietnam

POPULATIONS INCLUDED:
Male

AGE RANGE:
Adolescents
Adults

DOWNLOAD MEASURE

Scoring Procedures:

Raw scores for pros and cons were added. In the current paper these were converted to standardized score, and then to T scores.

PRIMARY CITATION:

Ha, B. T. T., Jayasuriya, R., & Owen, N. (2003). Male involvement in family planning in rural Vietnam: an application of the Transtheoretical Model. Health education research, 18(2), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/18.2.171

Pyschometric Score:

FORMATIVE RESEARCH

 Qualitative Research

 Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

 Field Expert Input

 Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

RELIABILITY

 Internal

 Test-retest

 Interrater

VALIDITY

 Content

 Face

 Criterion (gold-standard)

 Construct

Psychometric Scoring

HIGH
Total Score: 5.50/8 Points (HIGH) 

Citation Frequency

Medium

KEY

 FULL POINTS
 PARTIAL POINTS
 NOT ASSESSED
 NOT APPLICABLE

For more details, see Scoring Methodology

You have successfully registered

There was an error while trying to send your request. Please try again.

EMERGE will use the information you provide on this form to be in touch with you and to provide updates and marketing.