Mother's Autonomy in Decision Making (MADM)

The Mother's Autonomy in Decision Making (MADM) Scale is a 7-item self-report measure of an individual woman's experience of autonomy and participation in decision making during maternity care. Different aspects of autonomy and shared decision making captured by the scale include communication with provider regarding decision making, education about maternity care options, and the mother's freedom of choice among these options.

High Psychometric Score

ITEMS:

Please describe your experiences when making decisions and choosing options for care during this pregnancy. (Blanks auto-populated with provider type: i.e., family physician/obstetrician/midwife)

1. My _______ asked me how involved in decision making I wanted to be
2. My _______ told me that there are different options for my maternity care
3. My _______ explained the advantages and disadvantages of the maternity care options
4. My _______ helped me understand all the information
5. I was given enough time to thoroughly consider the different maternity care options
6. I was able to choose what I considered to be the best care options
7. My _______ respected that choice

Response Options:
(6-point Likert scale)
Completely disagree - 1
Strongly disagree - 2
Somewhat disagree - 3
Somewhat agree - 4
Strongly agree - 5
Completely agree - 6

CATEGORIES:


GEOGRAPHIES TESTED:

Canada

POPULATIONS INCLUDED:
Female

AGE RANGE:
Adults

DOWNLOAD MEASURE

Scoring Procedures:

Scores are summed across the seven items (range of scores 7-42). Higher scores reflect that women experienced greater agency and autonomy when engaging in the shared decision making process with a maternity care provider.

PRIMARY CITATION:

Vedam, S., Stoll, K., Martin, K., Rubashkin, N., Partridge, S., Thordarson, D., & Jolicoeur, G. (2017). The Mother’s Autonomy in Decision Making (MADM) scale: Patient-led development and psychometric testing of a new instrument to evaluate experience of maternity care. PLoS one, 12(2), e0171804. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171804

Pyschometric Score:

FORMATIVE RESEARCH

 Qualitative Research

 Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

 Field Expert Input

 Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

RELIABILITY

 Internal

 Test-retest

 Interrater

VALIDITY

 Content

 Face

 Criterion (gold-standard)

 Construct

Psychometric Scoring

HIGH
Total Score: 7.00/8 Points (HIGH) 

Citation Frequency

Medium

KEY

 FULL POINTS
 PARTIAL POINTS
 NOT ASSESSED
 NOT APPLICABLE

For more details, see Scoring Methodology

You have successfully registered

There was an error while trying to send your request. Please try again.

EMERGE will use the information you provide on this form to be in touch with you and to provide updates and marketing.