Chinese "What If" Situations Test (CWIST)

Chinese "What If" Situations Test (CWIST) is a 6-item measure where children are presented with six simulated situations that aims to assess the children's self-protection skills and their ability to discriminate abusive/ abductive situations from non-abusive/ nonabductive situations. The measure is based on the "What If" Situations Test (Wurtele, Hughes, & Owens, 1998) and adapted for the local context and language (Chinese).


ITEMS:

Is this situation okay or not okay?

1. A father hugs his daughter for receiving very good grades.
2. A nude man opens his long coat in front of several children.
3. A coach holds a child’s hands for freestyle swimming practice.
4. A boy is offered a ride by someone he recognizes as his mother’s friend.
5. A physician touches a boy’s genitals after he was injured playing baseball in school.
6. Two boys grab a girl’s arms and another pulls her pants down.

Response Options:
Okay
Not okay

CATEGORIES:


GEOGRAPHIES TESTED:

Taiwan

POPULATIONS INCLUDED:
Female
Male

AGE RANGE:
Adolescents
Children

Scoring Procedures:

The presented simulated situations are either okay (non-abusive/ nonabductive situations) or not okay (abusive/ abductive situations). Three situations were okay and three situations were not okay. If the respondent chooses the correct option, they receive 1 point. Scores were summed to form an Appropriate Situation Identification Score (ASIS; range = 0 to 3 points) and an Inappropriate Situation Identification Score (ISIS; range = 0 to 3 points). The ASIS subscale consists of items 1, 3 and 5. The ISIS subscale consists of items 2, 4 and 6. If the child identified a situation as “not okay,” four follow-up questions (i.e., what would you do; what would you say; who, if anyone, would you tell; and if you did tell someone, what would you say) were asked to assess the child’s self-protection/personal safety skills. Children’s responses to these four follow-up questions were rated according to the quality of the response, with scores ranging from 0 (ineffective/inappropriate response) to 2 (appropriate/assertive response). These responses were then summed for a maximum Total Skills Score (TSS) of 24.

PRIMARY CITATION:

Chen, Y. C., Fortson, B. L., & Tseng, K. W. (2012). Pilot evaluation of a sexual abuse prevention program for Taiwanese children. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 21(6), 621-645. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2012.726699

Psychometric Score:

FORMATIVE RESEARCH

 Qualitative Research

 Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

 Field Expert Input

 Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

RELIABILITY

 Internal

 Test-Retest

 Interrater

VALIDITY

 Content

 Face

 Criterion (gold-standard)

 Construct

Psychometric Scoring

MEDIUM
Total Score: 5.00/8 Points (MEDIUM) 

Citation Frequency

MEDIUM

KEY

 FULL POINTS
 PARTIAL POINTS
 NOT ASSESSED
 NOT APPLICABLE

For more details, see Scoring Methodology

You have successfully registered

There was an error while trying to send your request. Please try again.

EMERGE will use the information you provide on this form to be in touch with you and to provide updates and marketing.