Attribution of Rape Blame Scale

Attribution of Rape Blame Scale is a 20-item measure to examine the attitudes of mental health professionals regarding rape. The measure covers four dimensions of attribution of rape blame: Societal Blame, Victim Blame, Assailant Blame, and Sociological Status Blame.


Warning Flag

ITEMS:

1. There is a strong connection between the current morality and the crime of rape.
2. The amount of sex and violence in the media today strongly influences the rapist to commit rape.
3. When a rape occurs, it is the rapist's fault.
4. There is a strong relationship between women being regarded as sex objects by our society and the crime of rape.
5. The prevalence of rape is directly related to our societal values.
6. A man who commits rape should be locked up for his act.
7. Most rapists are "mentally ill" or psychologically disturbed.
8. Rape can be mainly attributed to peculiarities in the rapist's personality.
9. Women entice men to rape them.
10. Rape is a product of a sexually unhealthy society.
11. Women provoke their own rape by using bad judgment, acting seductively, etc.
12. The rape victim gets raped because she deserved it.
13. Women who get raped set themselves up to be raped.
14. A woman can avoid being raped by staying out of dangerous situations.
15. Alcohol and drugs are significant factors in the occurrence of rape.
16. Poorly lighted areas (i.e., dark alleys) contribute significantly to the occurrence of rape.
17. There is a certain kind of woman who gets raped.
18. Rape is more likely to occur in slum or "bad" areas.
19. Rapists are driven to rape by internal factors.
20. Hitchhiking by women increases the likelihood that they will be raped.

Response Options:
6-point Likert scale
Strongly disagree - 1
Strongly agree - 6

CATEGORIES:


GEOGRAPHIES TESTED:

United States of America

POPULATIONS INCLUDED:
Female
Male

AGE RANGE:
Adults

Scoring Procedures:

Not Available

PRIMARY CITATION:

Resick, P. A., & Jackson, T. L. (1981). Attitudes toward rape among mental health professionals. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9(4), 481-490. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00918177

Psychometric Score:

FORMATIVE RESEARCH

 Qualitative Research

 Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

 Field Expert Input

 Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

RELIABILITY

 Internal

 Test-retest

 Interrater

VALIDITY

 Content

 Face

 Criterion (gold-standard)

 Construct

Psychometric Scoring

MEDIUM
Total Score: 3.00/8 Points (MEDIUM) 

Citation Frequency

HIGH

KEY

 FULL POINTS
 PARTIAL POINTS
 NOT ASSESSED
 NOT APPLICABLE

For more details, see Scoring Methodology

Measure came from a peer-reviewed journal with a low impact score and/or inadequate information on psychometrics, but is an under-represented gender equality and empowerment construct

You have successfully registered

There was an error while trying to send your request. Please try again.

EMERGE will use the information you provide on this form to be in touch with you and to provide updates and marketing.