dimension: Health services and providers

Gender Competency for Family Planning Providers: Gender Sensitive Communication

Formative Research

Qualitative Research

Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

Field Expert Input

Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

Reliability

Internal

Test-retest

Interrater

Validity

Content

Face

Criterion (gold-standard)

Construct

KEY

Full Points Not Assessed Partial Points Not Applicable

Ease of Use

Readability

Scoring Clarity

Length

Gender Competency for Family Planning Providers: Promoting Individual Agency

Formative Research

Qualitative Research

Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

Field Expert Input

Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

Reliability

Internal

Test-retest

Interrater

Validity

Content

Face

Criterion (gold-standard)

Construct

KEY

Full Points Not Assessed Partial Points Not Applicable

Ease of Use

Readability

Scoring Clarity

Length

Gender Competency for Family Planning Providers: Supporting Legal Rights and Status Related to Family Planning

Formative Research

Qualitative Research

Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

Field Expert Input

Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

Reliability

Internal

Test-retest

Interrater

Validity

Content

Face

Criterion (gold-standard)

Construct

KEY

Full Points Not Assessed Partial Points Not Applicable

Ease of Use

Readability

Scoring Clarity

Length

Gender Competency for Family Planning Providers: Engaging Men and Boys as Partners

Formative Research

Qualitative Research

Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

Field Expert Input

Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

Reliability

Internal

Test-retest

Interrater

Validity

Content

Face

Criterion (gold-standard)

Construct

KEY

Full Points Not Assessed Partial Points Not Applicable

Ease of Use

Readability

Scoring Clarity

Length

Gender Competency for Family Planning Providers: Facilitating Positive Couples’ Communication and Cooperative Decision Making

Formative Research

Qualitative Research

Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

Field Expert Input

Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

Reliability

Internal

Test-retest

Interrater

Validity

Content

Face

Criterion (gold-standard)

Construct

KEY

Full Points Not Assessed Partial Points Not Applicable

Ease of Use

Readability

Scoring Clarity

Length

Gender Competency for Family Planning Providers: Addressing Gender-Based Violence

Formative Research

Qualitative Research

Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

Field Expert Input

Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

Reliability

Internal

Test-retest

Interrater

Validity

Content

Face

Criterion (gold-standard)

Construct

KEY

Full Points Not Assessed Partial Points Not Applicable

Ease of Use

Readability

Scoring Clarity

Length

Provider Attitudes towards Youth-Friendly Sexual and Reproductive Health Services

Formative Research

Qualitative Research

Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

Field Expert Input

Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

Reliability

Internal

Test-retest

Interrater

Validity

Content

Face

Criterion (gold-standard)

Construct

KEY

Full Points Not Assessed Partial Points Not Applicable

Ease of Use

Readability

Scoring Clarity

Length

Contraceptive Autonomy

Formative Research

Qualitative Research

Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

Field Expert Input

Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

Reliability

Internal

Test-retest

Interrater

Validity

Content

Face

Criterion (gold-standard)

Construct

KEY

Full Points Not Assessed Partial Points Not Applicable

Ease of Use

Readability

Scoring Clarity

Length

Women’s Voices in Open, Inclusive Communities and Effective Spaces (VOICES)

Formative Research

Qualitative Research

Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

Field Expert Input

Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

Reliability

Internal

Test-retest

Interrater

Validity

Content

Face

Criterion (gold-standard)

Construct

KEY

Full Points Not Assessed Partial Points Not Applicable

Ease of Use

Readability

Scoring Clarity

Length

Health Workers’ Voices in Open, Inclusive Communities and Effective Spaces (VOICES)

Formative Research

Qualitative Research

Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

Field Expert Input

Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

Reliability

Internal

Test-retest

Interrater

Validity

Content

Face

Criterion (gold-standard)

Construct

KEY

Full Points Not Assessed Partial Points Not Applicable

Ease of Use

Readability

Scoring Clarity

Length

Categories

Items:

Scoring Procedures

Original Citation

Scoring breakdown

Formative Research

Reliability

Validity

KEY

Ease of Use

Categories

Items:

Scoring Procedures

Original Citation

Scoring breakdown

Formative Research

Reliability

Validity

KEY

Ease of Use

Categories

Items:

Scoring Procedures

Original Citation

Scoring breakdown

Formative Research

Reliability

Validity

KEY

Ease of Use

Categories

Items:

Scoring Procedures

Original Citation

Scoring breakdown

Formative Research

Reliability

Validity

KEY

Ease of Use

Categories

Items:

Scoring Procedures

Original Citation

Scoring breakdown

Formative Research

Reliability

Validity

KEY

Ease of Use

Categories

Items:

Scoring Procedures

Original Citation

Scoring breakdown

Formative Research

Reliability

Validity

KEY

Ease of Use

Categories

Items:

Scoring Procedures

Original Citation

Scoring breakdown

Formative Research

Reliability

Validity

KEY

Ease of Use

Categories

Items:

Scoring Procedures

Original Citation

Scoring breakdown

Formative Research

Reliability

Validity

KEY

Ease of Use